Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Gesundheitswesen ; 2021 Dec 23.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314992

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic, the working conditions of professional caregivers have tougher. This has lead to an increased desire to leave the profession. Since thoughts of leaving are influenced by factors such as ability to work and the relationship between effort and reward, both should be recorded and examined in relation to the desire to leave the profession. METHODOLOGY: In a standardized, online-based cross-sectional study, nurses from all areas were asked about their ability to work (Work Ability Index: WAI), the ratio of effort and reward (Effort-Reward-Imbalance: ERI-Ratio) as well as their desire to either leave the job or to change employers. RESULTS: A total of 2,689 questionnaires returned by nurses (average 41.3 years old, 75.1% female) were evaluated. The WAI indicates an average working ability (37.9 (6.7)). Nurses put in more effort than they get rewarded for (ERI ratio 1.7 (0.5)). 38.3% of the nurses considered leaving their job several times a month or more frequently, 30.6% to change their employers. Predicting factors were WAI (OR 0.881, 95%-CI 0.866; 0.897 and 0.923, 95%-CI 0.908; 0.938) and ERI ratio (OR 4.076, 95%-CI 3.224; 5.149 and 4.203, 95%-CI 3.312; 5.334). CONCLUSION: The ability to work and, in particular, the perception of professional effort and the reward received becomes apparent as having an influence on the idea of leaving the profession. The present results show that the ERI is of particular importance. Accordingly, it is important to find out which reward factors have a positive effect on remaining in the profession. The proportion of nurses with an academic degree is higher than expected which might have influenced the results.

2.
Public Health Nurs ; 39(3): 693-699, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1566320

ABSTRACT

DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in December 2020/January 2021 in the five significant cities of Germany. SAMPLE: 135 of 244 identified service institutions took part in the evaluation. MEASUREMENTS: This evaluation included changes in institutions' operating hours as well as capacity for homeless people. Service institutions described changes in guests' characteristics, moods, and mental burden. Finally, equipment including face masks, coveralls, and gloves was investigated. In addition, the study examined how the cooperation with the health authorities works. RESULTS: Institutions reduced their operating hours and capacity for guests (62.4%). Increased costs, which they had to cover themselves, were reported by 70.9% of institutions. Institutions reported, that guests showed more symptoms of aggression (15%), anxiety (25%), and desperation (32%) and fewer signs of being relaxed (75%). The institutions reported room for improvement in PPE supplies and collaboration with health authorities. CONCLUSIONS: Services are limited for a vulnerable population, which shows changes in moods and mental health. Health authorities are not sufficiently engaged to take over the role of institutions in caring for homeless people. In the future, in-depth investigation to improve this is necessary.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ill-Housed Persons , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Humans , Pandemics
3.
Pflege ; 34(1): 3-12, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1087407

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 pandemic in Berlin and Brandenburg - A hospital survey from nursing management perspective Abstract. Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, it is unclear how hospitals in the federal states of Berlin and Brandenburg are structured with regard to structural adaptions, personnel situations, protective equipment and trainings. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the current status of all hospitals in both states. Methods: In April 2020, an online survey of all hospitals in Berlin and Brandenburg (n = 99) was carried out. Structural capacities, the personnel situation, protective equipment and training were investigated. Results: The hospitals (response rate: 31.3 %) have made all structural changes except for n = 1 facility. The majority of the failure rate is critically stated as 5 - 10 % before (58.6 %) and during the pandemic (51.5 %). The proportion with > 10 % default rate increases from 20.7 % to 31.0 %. 45.2 % of hospitals report that they rarely have shortage in protective clothing. Nurses at peripheral wards are often trained in handling with respiratory patients. The duration is in median 2 - 8 hours. No significant differences between Berlin and Brandenburg were found. Conclusions: At the time of the survey, the hospitals in Berlin and Brandenburg were well prepared for the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2020, the results indicate that hospitals are well prepared to ensure the health care provision.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Pandemics , Berlin/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitals , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL